| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jd1450
Joined: 23 Jul 2009
Posts: 33
Location: brazil
|
 Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 1:10 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| RedForkFarmer wrote: | So that equals about 100 bushels per acre  If I did my math right, that's a really good yield!
Here we only average 25 for dryland and around 80 for irrigated. |
I think there's something wrong here, let one acre = 4047 meters²
one hectare = 10000 meters² 01 bushel = 27,215 kg if I'm not mistaken our productivity Equals 53 bushels acre
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RedFork2.0
Joined: 06 Feb 2010
Posts: 443
Location: Oklahoma, USA!!!
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 1:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
I could have used the formula wrong, surprise surprise...
_________________
AKA: RedForkFarmer
JT |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JohnDeereJunkie
Quality Poster
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 790
Location: Turbotville, Pennsylvania, USA
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 4:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
RedFork, it's that new math, it's got you all messed up!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RedFork2.0
Joined: 06 Feb 2010
Posts: 443
Location: Oklahoma, USA!!!
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 4:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I get confused with metric stuff anyway. It would be so nice if the whole world went by one standard system.....
_________________
AKA: RedForkFarmer
JT |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jd1450
Joined: 23 Jul 2009
Posts: 33
Location: brazil
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ooo yes a standard system would be great
where each region uses a different measure of area
confuses a lot of people head 
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JohnDeereJunkie
Quality Poster
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 790
Location: Turbotville, Pennsylvania, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 4:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| yeah one standard would make things ALOT simpler! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
johndeere1993
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 721
Location: Queesland, Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 6:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
nice photos and good yields.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jd1450
Joined: 23 Jul 2009
Posts: 33
Location: brazil
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| johndeere1993 wrote: | | nice photos and good yields. |
thanks, yields were very good had good rains here
but soybean prices are low...
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
johndeere1993
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 721
Location: Queesland, Australia
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yeah i think grain prices generally really are low. We havnt grow soybeans for years. We use to at our old farm which was south of were we farm today. But yeah we grew irrigated soybeans and they averaged 4-5t/ha
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Case IH
Joined: 02 Apr 2009
Posts: 434
Location: southern illinois
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 3:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| so ur beans were rouund 50 bushels and acre. our best was 72 bpa last fall and our worst was 22 bpa on some that got frost bit...what r ur average corn yields |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jd1450
Joined: 23 Jul 2009
Posts: 33
Location: brazil
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Currently only plant corn in the winter right after the soybean harvest
corn yield last year was 5.2t/ha
In summer the corn can get 9 or 10 t / ha
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Case IH
Joined: 02 Apr 2009
Posts: 434
Location: southern illinois
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
i could do this but if anyone could conert that if they dont mind im lazy  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jd1450
Joined: 23 Jul 2009
Posts: 33
Location: brazil
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ 
Search 
Memberlist 
Usergroups
Register
Profile 
Log in to check your private messages 
Log in 
